We have become so particularized in surgery as in so
numerous other things, that we occasionally really accept as factual that human
development proceeds from one tidy little class to the next.
One day we are renowned as "infants." The next, we
are in early childhood. Then, possibly pre-pubescence, pursued by adolescence
and juvenile adulthood. Then we are "working adults," as are against
to other types of mature individuals who are fortunate sufficient not to have
classes of their own. And then, of course, we become "older people"
and the "aged."
This is one of those "everything they've been telling
you is wrong" articles. It examines as though genes might have rather
little to manage with lifespan. A large-scale study of equal twins discovered
an mean ten-year distinction in lifespan, and no one understands why. The
distinction isn't just persons who past away juvenile of misfortunes attaching
up the stats.
A doctor or a counselor will state, "You understand,
your dad is getting on in years. You can anticipate such-and-such to occur, and
you should arrange your family for this or that other thing to happen."
And superficially this sequence of happenings may really happen much as it is
described.
We are inclined to
accept those propositions because they are orderly and, thus comforting,
whereas we understand from our own individual, hard know-how that life actually
doesn't unfold that neatly. Events falls in one upon the other. Cause and
result is very often a shrewd estimate at best. Other persons and the natural
environment itself will initiate some happenings to happen early and hold up or
avert other ones from happening at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment